Even when I was working as an ordained minister, I was
more interested in the discipline of theological reflection as a way of framing
questions than of providing answers. It seemed to me that the primary value in
a lot of serious theology (as opposed to ordinary folk theology) was that it
provided something other than easy answers. I didn't ignore the extent to which
official theological doctrine was about maintaining power over people. I have
to admit that I wasn't above using my arcane knowledge of theology to augment
the power I had over laity. Nonetheless, I was mainly interested in theology as
a body of work that could be mined for helpful resources. It was less about the
content than it was about the search itself.
So I don't believe that becoming trained to think
theologically was a total waste of time. Being practiced in posing big
questions is somewhat rare these days. Almost everybody is a specialist. Few
know or even much care about how each specialty fits into the big picture. Theology,
prior to the scientific revolution, used to have the role of determining how
everything fit together. Today, it is the physicists who are the most serious
contenders for the role of probing the biggest questions that can be imagined. They
have the most sound knowledge about cosmology. They are the ones who are
working on what they call, in all seriousness, "a theory of
everything".
I have my doubts about the possibility of formulating a
theory of everything, not because of the limitations of human beings, but
instead because the ultimate secrets of life are probably not reducible to a
single theoretical construct. It seems to me that the attributes that are most
helpful in the search for answers to life's deepest and most challenging
questions are open-mindedness, honesty, humility, and being prepared for mind-blowing,
life-changing surprises. I'm not wanting to go back to the mystification within
which theology has traditionally been shrouded; however, I do believe that we
would do well to restore mystery to a position of centrality.
No comments:
Post a Comment